C&L Legal C&L Legal

Solving client satisfaction and retention issues
There is a close link between client and staff satisfaction but there is only one boss in a company - the client - and they can sack everyone in the company from the chairman down by choosing to take his business elsewhere.

Client satisfaction

More...

Retention - staff satisfaction

More...

Implementing HR processes and procedures

More...

What to do? How it will help your business
Consistent job descriptions for all staff. So everyone understands what is expected of them.
Appraisal process - to formally review performance based on performance measurements. To monitor and help improve your ability to manage performance with documented evidence including achievement of objectives.
Understand training needs. Ensure employees receive the necessary training.
Link reward to absenteeism/performance To provide a clear picture of absenteeism and send a clear message that this is linked to bonuses/salary increases (pending a discussion about the contracts your staff have).
Set a calendar of HR activity To ensure everyone is clear what needs to be completed by when, with whom etc.

As well as providing support to set up HR processes and implement them we also provide coaching and training for those responsible for managing the administration and running the processes – this will most likely be your practice manager or your senior team.

What’s more grants are available from Business Link to help fund such training. Register to find out more at http://www.businesslink.gov.uk

Refreshing your interview questions

More...

New roles in the industry – focus on business development

More...

Business development locums

More...



© 2007 Central Legal Recruitment Ltd | Contact Us
Register a vacancy

*Urban Myth or True Story* | 2008-11-19

As a Legal Recruiter we get to delve into people's lives! Is this a true story or an urban training contract myth? Training Contract was offered to a candidate with a decent salary but a relocation was part of the package. The candidate at first instance turned down the offer of a training contract for a paralegal position closer to home in an area of law which was the candidate's first choice. Some 2 months later the candidate decides that this was a mistake and wants to resurrect the offer. After much negotiation the firm agrees to the training contract at a higher salary specified by the candidate. The offer was made to the candidate who at this point no longer had a job. The candidate turns down the offer yet again as the candidate's partner was not able to relocate with the candidate. What is your take on this? Do let me know!!